


ARTICLE 

Year : 2012  Volume
: 2
 Issue : 1  Page : 1923 

Error Vector Magnitude Analysis of Radiooverfiber Systems Based on Single Side Band Modulation
Shelly Singla, Sandeep Arya
Guru Jambeshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, Haryana, India
Date of Web Publication  24Mar2012 
Correspondence Address: Shelly Singla Guru Jambeshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, Haryana India
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  Check 
DOI: 10.4103/09768580.93235
Abstract   
In order to meet the increasing demand for wireless connectivity and large coverage, radiooverfiber (RoF) infrastructure has been suggested as a costeffective solution for the provisioning of bandwidth in small cell size. In the present work, performance analysis has been done for radio over systems based on optical single side band technique. Error vector magnitude (EVM) has also been quantified for RoF link in the presence of dispersion and phase noise incorporating dual electrode MachZehnder modulator (DEMZM). It is found that the laser phase noise is dominant over long distances. Keywords: Dual electrode MachZehnder modulator, Error vector magnitude, Optical single sideband, Radiooverfiber
How to cite this article: Singla S, Arya S. Error Vector Magnitude Analysis of Radiooverfiber Systems Based on Single Side Band Modulation. J Eng Technol 2012;2:1923 
How to cite this URL: Singla S, Arya S. Error Vector Magnitude Analysis of Radiooverfiber Systems Based on Single Side Band Modulation. J Eng Technol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2020 May 30];2:1923. Available from: http://www.onlinejet.net/text.asp?2012/2/1/19/93235 
1. Introduction   
Facing explosive demands of high channel capacity, wider service coverage and broadband radiooverfiber (RoF) system entail a technology that can meet those requirements in the coming future. Hence, RoF technology is the most promising solution for enhancing the capacity and mobility as well as lessening costs of the base stations (BSs) where most of signal processing such as RF generation, coding, multiplexing and modulation can be done at the central station (CS). However, the performance of RoF systems depends on the method used to generate the optically modulated radio frequency (RF) signal, power degradation due to fiber chromatic dispersion, nonlinearity due to an optical power level, and phase noises from a laser and an RF oscillator. There are two techniques to generate the optically modulated RF signal: direct and external modulation. The direct modulation scheme is simple but suffers from a laserfrequency chirp effect, and this chirp effect results in severe degradation of the system performance. However, this can be eliminated by using the externalmodulation scheme instead of the direct modulation scheme ^{[1]} . Although the externalmodulation scheme is employed, the conventional optical double sideband (ODSB) signal can degrade the received RF signal power due to fiber chromatic dispersion drastically. For overcoming the power degradation, an optical single sideband (OSSB) signal, generated by using a phase shifter and a dualelectrode (DE) MachZehnder modulator (MZM), is employed ^{[2]} . In addition to these two effects, the nonlinearity of an optical fiber can give a large penalty on the longhaul transmission and multi channel system using a highpower signal. For the highpower transmission, the nonlinear effect should be managed by utilizing a modulation format ^{[3]} . Kitayama et al., ^{[4]} analyzed the system performance for an ODSB signal including laser phase noise and suggested how to compensate the differential delay by using a dispersion compensating fiber (DCF). He focused on how to compensate fiber chromatic dispersion for the ODSB signal experimentally and analytically rather than analyze the effect of the phase noise on the performance in detail. Barry and Lee ^{[5]} and Salz ^{[6]} analyzed the performance of coherent optical systems with laser phase noise by utilizing a Wiener process, since coherent detection provides better sensitivity than that of direct detection, while direct detection has a simple structure. Gallion and Debarge ^{[7]} and Tkach ^{[8]} used an autocorrelation function and a PSD function for evaluating the effect of the laser line width and fiber chromatic dispersion on the system performance. In ^{[9]} , the CNR penalty due to the laser line width is negligible in a narrow laser line width and small differential delay (100ps) while the CNR penalty is quite large in a broad laser line width and large differential delay. Sharma et al., ^{[10]} analyzed the impact of spectral width of laser over intensity noise introduced inside the fiber incorporating higher order dispersion parameters and showed that intensity noise can be reduced by reducing the laser line width to kHz range in longhaul communication systems. A technique for measuring residual single sideband (SSB) microwave phase noise, added by an externally modulated fiberoptic link, was reported in ^{[11]} . A model for calculating additive phase noise in direct modulation optical links was presented in ^{[12]} . Chromatic dispersion effects on the phase noise of optical millimeterwave systems were investigated in ^{[13]} and ^{[14]} for direct and remote heterodyne detection. Performance comparison of systems for various modulation formats have been reported by ^{[15]} . Number of papers has been published covering the modelling, analysis of performance characteristics and measurement of phase noise in optical links within various contexts. In this work, we have studied by simulation that effect of laserspectral width in a singletone OSSBRoF transmission system incorporating DEMZM modulator and derived EVM for the system, an important performance characteristic in RoF systems. EVM is a measure of errors between the measured symbols and expected symbols. The use of EVM as a performance metric is limited to radio frequency engineering to infer reception the performance at the receiver.
2. Theoretical Modeling and Analysis   
An OSSB signal is generated by using dual electrode MZM and a phase shifter. A RF signal from an oscillator is split by a power splitter and a 90° phase shifter. This RF signal is optically modulated by the laser diode (LD) with an MZM. The optically modulated signal is transmitted to the photo diode (PD) and the photocurrent corresponding to the transmitted RF signal is extracted by the filter. First, the optical signals from the optical source, laser diode and the RF oscillator are modeled as:
Where, A ^{d} and V_{o} define amplitudes from the optical source and the RF oscillator signal, ω_{d} and ω_{o} define angular frequencies of the signals from the LD and the RF oscillator, and Φ_{d} (t) and Φ_{o} (t) are phasenoise processes. The OSSB signal generated using Dual electrode MZM is modeled in equation (3).
After the transmission of signal over L km fiber, the signal can be represented as equation (4) & in this equation L_{add} denotes an additional loss in the optical link, α_{fiber} is the SSMF loss, L_{fiber} is the transmission distance of the SSMF, and τ_{0} and τ_{+} define group delays for a center angular frequency of ω_{d} and an upper sideband frequency of ω_{d} + ω_{o} . φ_{1} and φ_{2} are phaseshift parameters for specific frequencies due to the fiber chromatic dispersion.
The photocurrent i(t) can be obtained as
Where η defines the responsibility of the PD and is the squarelaw detection.
To evaluate the SNR, we utilize the autocorrelation function and the PSD of the photocurrent.
The autocorrelation function R _{1} (τ) is obtained as
R _{1} (τ) = (i(t).i(t+ τ))
Now we will evaluate PSD function which is Fourier transform of R_{I}(τ)
S_{1}(f) = f 〈 R_{1} (τ)ρ
The received RF carrier Power P _{rcd} is approximately represented as follows
Signaltonoise ratio (SNR) can be used to predict the performance of the system. The SNR induced by the differential delay from the fiber chromatic dispersion and the line widths from the laser and the RF oscillator is found as:
3. Error Vector Magnitude (EVM) Analysis   
EVM measurements are often performed on vector signal analyzers (VSAs), realtime analyzers or other instruments that capture a time record and internally perform a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to enable frequency domain analysis. Signals are down converted before EVM calculations are made ^{[16]} . The EVM is defined as the rootmeansquare (RMS) value of the difference between a collection of measured symbols and ideal symbols. These differences are averaged over a given, typically large number of symbols and are often shown as a percent of the average power per symbols of the constellation.
Where η = responsivity, A^{d}_{1} = constant related to the laser light amplitude and the losses in fiber, MZM and the joint and splices given by J= Bessel function of 1 ^{st} kind, of order n and α_{1} = normalized RF voltage given by where A^{d}_{1} is the amplitude of laser light, L _{MZM} is the lose in the MZM, L _{add} is the factor accounting for the additional loss in the fiber, α_{fiber} is the loss in the fiber and L_{fiber} is the length of fiber. V_{rf} is the input RF voltage and Vπ is the MZM switching voltage, p is the ratio of the power required for a particular filter used to the total carrier power. This parameter incorporates the effect of the bandwidth of the filter being used and N_{o} is the additive white Gaussian noise power spectral density. The parameters 2γ_{LD} = 2π∆V_{LD} and 2γ_{RF} = 2π∆V_{RF} , define the angular fulllinewidth at half maximum (FWHM) of the lorentzian shape for the laser and the RF oscillator and 2γ_{t} = 2π∆V_{LD} + π∆V_{RF} gives the total line width. τ = τ ± τ _{o} is the differential delay due to the fiber chromatic dispersion and is given by
Where, D is the fiber chromatic dispersion parameter, L_{fiber} is the fiber length, f_{RF} is the RF frequency and c is the speed of light.
The first parameter is the photodiode responsivity η. For most of the photo diodes its values is between 0.6 and 0.8. Taking the value of η as 0.7 ^{[11]} . Now the second constant is .
Here L_{MZM} is the loss of the DEMZM. Now considering the MZM as an integrated waveguide power splitter and combiner, its value can be assumed to be negligible. L _{add}is the additional loss caused by the fiber components such as the splices, joints, etc. Its value for a 10km fiber link can be taken as approximately 3 dB and is varied accordingly for various length of fiber. α_{fiber} is the loss per km of the fiber and is around 0.2 dB/km for SSMF. L_{fiber} is the length of the fiber and is equal to 10 km for this case. α is the modulation index of the MZM and is equal to α=V_{rf} / V_{π}. Now taking V _{rf} = 1 mV and V_{π}=2.2V, we obtain α=0.00045 then the modulation index is given as απ = 0.0014. It gives equal to 1 approximately. From above all, the value of is calculated as 0.1342. N_{0} is the power spectral density of the AWGN for very low noise case, it can be taken as 10^{11}. Now α_{1} depends upon the first harmonic of the photo detector and the fundamental component. So the value of α_{1} is 0.001. Thus all the constants terms of EVM are evaluated and its derived expression is then used to study the effects of the laser line width and dispersion on the EVM of the RoF system.
4. Simulation Parameters   
5. Result and Discussion   
The impact of laser line width, ΔV_{LD} is described in [Figure 1] and [Figure 2] and results are calculated with RF oscillator line width of 0.1Hz, 0.8Hz and 1Hz for OSSBRoF transmission system with laser line width varying from 100 to 700 MHz as a function of laser phase through SSMF fiber of different optical links (1030 km) and firstorder dispersion of 17 ps/nm km. In order to investigate the effect of the line width, we set the Pvalue as 0.5 in any situation, and it means that the same type of filter, such as the halfpower bandwidth, is utilized for all cases. It can be seen from [Figure 1] that EVM has an increasing trend with increase in laser line width over various RF oscillator line widths of 0.1 Hz, 0.8 Hz and 1 Hz, as the line width of RF oscillator is usually less than 1 Hz, for a 10km fiber. An increase of 2 dB is observed as the laser line width is swept from 100 to 700 MHz and from [Figure 2] it can be been seen that laser noise is dominant over long distances. The results are calculated for 1030 km OSSBRoF transmission system as it requires less bandwidth than DSSBRoF system and is tolerable for power degradation due to a chromatic fiberdispersion, through a standard singlemode fiber carried. The EVM due to the laser line width increases dramatically over a specific distance. For 30 km exponential increment is observed giving an increment of about 7 dB in EVM while the rate of increment is lesser at 20 km and 10 km. Therefore, the laser line width should be selected carefully in a longhaul transmission since the large differential delay and large laser line width cause serious performance degradation.  Figure 1: Combined effect of laser line width and RF oscillator linewidth on EVM
Click here to view 
6. Conclusions   
EVM performance analysis of single side bandbased RoF system employing MZM has been carried out theoretically and numerical simulation has also been done. It is observed that EVM increases exponentially with increase in laser line width with respect to transmission distance and a gradual increment exist with increase in RF oscillator line width and laser line width.
References   
1.  G. H. Smith, and D. Novak, "Overcoming chromaticdispersion effects in fiber wireless systems incorporating external modulators", IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1410, 1997. 
2.  J. Leibrich, "CFRZDPSK for suppression of XPM on dispersion managed longhaul optical WDM transmission on standard singlemode fiber", IEEE Photon Technology Letter, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 155, 2002. 
3.  Y. J. Wen, "Power level optimization of 40 Gb/s DWDM systems with hybrid Raman/EDFA amplification", In Proc. Conf. Optical Internet/Australian Conf. Optical Fibre Technology (COIN/ACOFT), Melbourne, Australia, pp. 309, 2003. 
4.  K. I. Kitayama, "Ultimate performance of optical DSB signalbased millimeter wave fiberradio system: Effect of laser phase noise", Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1774, 1999. 
5.  J. R. Barry, and E. A. Lee, "Performance of coherent optical receivers", Proc Inst Elect Eng, vol. 78, no. 8, pp. 1369, 1990. 
6.  J. Salz, "Modulation and detection for coherent lightwave communications", IEEE Commun Magazine, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 38, 1986. 
7.  P. B. Gallion, and G. Debarge, "Quantum phase noise and field correlation in single frequency semiconductor laser systems", IEEE J Quantum Electron, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 343, 1984. 
8.  R. W. Tkach, "Phase noise and line width in an InGaAsP DFB laser", J Lightwave Technology, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 1711, 1986. 
9.  T. S. Cho, C. Yun, J. I. Song, and K. Kim, "Analysis of CNR penalty of RadioOverFiber systems including the effects of phase noise from laser and RF oscillator", Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 23, no. 12, 2005. 
10.  V. Sharma, A. Singh, and A. K. Sharma, "Analysis and simulation of the effect of spectral width over intensity noise under the impact of higherorder dispersion parameters in the optical communication systems", Opt Commun, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 3495, 2008. 
11.  V. Sharma, A. Singh, and A. K. Sharma, "Simulative investigation on the impact of laserspectral width in singletone radiooverfiber transmission system using optical single sideband technique", Optics and Lasers in Engineering, vol. 47, pp. 1145, 2009. 
12.  U. Gliese, "Chromatic dispersion in fiberoptic microwave and millimeterwave links", IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1716, 1996. 
13.  T. S. Cho, "Modified BER estimation of optical link considering the nonlinear effect of the fiber", Korean Inst Commun Sci (KICS), vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 1707, 2001. 
14.  M. Iqbal, and K. Kim, "Performance of QAM systems with respect to phase noise spectral shape", Proceedings of the Canadian conference on electrical and computer engineering, Halifax, NS, Canada, pp. 1416, 2000. 
15.  M. Iqbal, J. Lee, and K. Kim, "Performance comparison of digital modulation schemes with respect to phase noise spectral shape", Proceedings of the electrical and computer engineering, Halifax, NS, Canada, pp. 85, 2000. 
16.  K. Ghairabeh, K. Gard, and M. Steer, "Accurate Estimation of Digital Communication System Metrics  SNR, EVM in a Nonlinear Amplifier Environment", IEEE Transactions on Communications, pp. 734, 2005. 
Authors   
Shelly Singla holds a B.E. in Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering and M.E in Electronics and Communication Engineering. Since January 2009 she has been a research scholar at GJUS&T, Hisar working on broadband wireless access technology and radio over fiber systems.
Dr. Sandeep K Arya received his B.Tech., M.Tech. and Ph.D. Degrees from the Dept. of Electronics, Communication, and Computer Engineering, Regional Engineering College, (NIT) Kurukshetra. He has also worked as faculty member in the Dept. of Electronics and Communication Engineering, NIT, Jalandhar during 19972004, Punjab, India. Since September, 2004, he is working as Associate Professor and Chairperson in the department of Electronics Communication Engineering, Guru Jambheshwar University Science & Technology Hisar, India. He is responsible for teaching, department development and research in the area of dispersion compensation, and Nonlinearities in WDM systems and networks. He is having more than 18 Years teaching and research experience and more than 45 research papers published/ presented in various national/international Journals and conferences. His present area of research includes Nonlinearities, Dispersion Compensation for linear and nonlinear optical systems and VLSI Design.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
